This site uses cookies.

January 2026 Contents

Welcome to the January 2026 issue of PI Brief Update Law Journal. Click the relevant links below to read the articles.

CPD

Note that there are no new monthly CPD quizzes since the SRA and the BSB have both updated their CPD schemes to eliminate this requirement. Reading PIBULJ articles can still help to meet your CPD needs. For further details see our CPD Information page.

 

Personal Injury Articles
A Pain in the Neck: The Negative Consequences of the Whiplash Reforms - Georgina Pressdee, Temple Garden Chambers
On 29 October 2025, the MoJ announced its post-implementation review of the Whiplash Reform Programme, including the increase in the small claims track (SCT) limit from £1,000 to £5,000 for road traffic accident (RTA) personal injury (PI) claims. This article outlines and comments on the Law Society's response. The thrust of the Law Society's response is that the reforms have had a negative impact on Claimants and PI practitioners without achieving their core aims. In particular, the reforms have failed to...
Driving a coach and horses: District Judge reins in unqualified advocates - Michael Brooks Reid, Temple Garden Chambers
Michael Brooks Reid discusses the decision of District Judge Pratt ("the Judge") in Vehicle Control Services Ltd v Langley [2026] EWCC 1, which will be undoubtedly ruffling feathers at HQ of the well-known advocacy agencies. The case was a routine small claims trial over an unpaid parking charge. The only individual in Court who appeared for the Claimant was Mr Boaten, a "Solicitor's Agent" (which, as the Judge noted, is a misleading non-legislative term). In a familiar arrangement, the Claimant had...
Hire Education: Court of Appeal guidance on non-party costs orders against credit hire organisations - Michael Brooks Reid, Temple Garden Chambers
Michael Brooks Reid comments on the recent Court of Appeal judgment in Tescher v Direct Accident Management Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 733, a decision which may signify a change of landscape in the world of credit hire litigation. This judgment concerned two conjoined RTA claims. In each, an impecunious claimant had hired a replacement vehicle on credit, with payment deferred, in the usual way, until the conclusion of proceedings. The claims included both PI and credit hire elements. In Tescher, the claim was dismissed at trial; in AXA v Spectra, the claimant...
Court of Appeal Settles the Debate: Liability Only Part 36 Offers on the Fast Track - Georgina Pressdee, Temple Garden Chambers
The Court of Appeal had handed down a unanimous judgment in Smithstone v Tranmoor Primary School [2026] EWCA Civ 13 providing clear guidance on when a liability only Part 36 offer will be effective on the fast track. The Claim was brought by a child who had suffered a minor injury when his fingers became trapped in a door. It originated in the Low Value Fixed Costs regime and was eventually allocated to the Fast Track following the Defendant's denial of liability and allegation of contributory negligence...
Clinical Negligence Medicine by Dr Mark Burgin
The Importance of The Medical Records Review - Dr Mark Burgin
Dr Mark Burgin discusses what medical experts mean by the words they use to describe their process of medical records review and how this impacts the legal case. Summarising over 5000 medical records over 30 years as a GP, medical expert and disability analysis has been a large part of my work life. During that time improvements in technology have impacted the quality and detail that is possible. Now even handwritten records in another language can be faithfully transcribed into a form the court can read with ease...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.