This site uses cookies.

Back to Basics: Should Credit Hire be Stripped? - Gary Herring - Horwich Farrelly Solicitors

11/09/14.  In Dimond v Lovell the House of Lords made it all seem so simple. In a case where the claimant sought hire charges in the princely sum of £346.63, it was held that a claimant who uses a credit hire service, even where doing so is perfectly reasonable, nonetheless cannot recover the full credit hire rate. Rather, the rate has to be reduced to account for the cost of the additional, and legally irrecoverable, services provided by the credit hire company over and above the costs of simple vehicle hire. Therefore, the proper measure of the recoverable loss is the ‘spot rate’.

So far, so good. But what is the ‘spot rate’, exactly?

The first attempt to find out came two years after Dimond in Clark v Ardington. Three possible methods were considered by the Court of Appeal. Firstly, simply applying a “reasonable discount” to the credit hire charge was rejected as too...

Image ©

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.