This site uses cookies.

31 May 2011 - PI Practitioner

Interest

Davies v Inman [1999] PIQR Q26

That Court of Appeal set out that, save in a case where there are special reasons not to, there is a ‘presumption that interest is to be awarded on compensation arising from personal injuries’.

Headford v Bristol and District Health Authority [1995] PIQR] P180

The court that determines whether there are such special reasons is the court that awards interest – that is to say it is not for another court to tie the trial judge’s hands.

Hobin v Douglas (No 1) [[1998] CLY 1431

Though it is normally considered that the ‘half rate over the whole period’ approach set out in Jefford v Gee is the best way to calculate interest on Special Damages, Roch LJ set out in this case that a judge is free to depart from that method if another method of calculation would produce a fairer and more accurate result.

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.