This site uses cookies.

The LDFRC scheme latest: reforms expected by October 2024 - Amy Lanham Coles, Temple Garden Chambers

15/05/24. April has come and gone and while the Lower Damages Clinical Negligence Claim (“LDFRC”) scheme has not been implemented as originally planned, there have been two recent updates.

Firstly, as per the Civil Procedure Rule Committee minutes from March 2024, the implementation date has been pushed back to October 2024 for the entire scheme. There remain outstanding issues to resolve before draft rules can be published (expect these in the summer). 

Secondly, the government has published their consultation outcome for the supplementary consultation on disbursements under the LDFRC scheme. The government intends:

  1. To allow expert report fees (including expert costs associated with the report) and ‘after the event’ (ATE) insurance premiums covering expert reports for all LDFRC scheme claims – without a cap for now at least;
  2. To allow recovery of court fees for a Part 8 application for pre-action disclosure in all LDFRC scheme claims, to ensure that parties are able to obtain evidence such as medical records early;
  3. To allow separate recovery of disbursements in relation to applications for a stay in LDFRC scheme proceedings, where the claim is issued for limitation purposes;
  4. To allow recovery for counsel’s advice and court fees for Part 8 approval hearings for children and protected parties under the LDFRC scheme;
  5. To exclude inquests from the rules relating to costs and disbursements in the LDFRC scheme – so that costs and disbursements in inquests will be recoverable to the extent that they would in non-LDFRC clinical negligence claims.

For past reporting on the scheme see here.

Image ©iStockphoto.com/Tero Vesalainen

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.