This site uses cookies.

Future Case Management and Legal Costs: a point of principle & restrained guidance in Hadley v Przybylo [2024] EWCA Civ 250 - Amy Lanham Coles, Temple Garden Chambers

24/04/24. This case raised an important question: is the cost of a fee earner’s attendance at rehabilitation case management meetings recoverable as legal costs?

BACKGROUND

Following catastrophic injuries sustained by the Claimant in a road traffic accident and admission of negligence by the Defendant, this claim was settled (subject to approval) for a lump sum of £5.6 million and an annual sum of £170,000 for case and care management. Costs remained in dispute and following ADR there was one contested item of future costs. The Claimant sought to include substantial sums of future costs for the Claimant’s solicitors’ attendance at case management meetings with the Claimant’s medical and other professionals. This had been included in the “issues and statements of case” phase on Form H.

In the court below, Master McCloud accepted the Defendant’s submission that “costs” were legal costs incurred in the progress of litigation (para 15). She considered that these proposed future costs were inherently “non-progressive” (para 16) and therefore disallowed £52,000 worth of costs. The Claimant appealed.

JUDGMENT

The Court of Appeal disagreed with the Master, allowing the appeal and concluding these costs were recoverable in theory. The Court sidestepped the question as to whether these costs ought to or could be claimed as damages (at paras 27-28). Focusing on costs recovery, the Court placed emphasis on s. 51(1) Senior Courts Act 1981 and the principle that a party could...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/georgeclerk

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.