This site uses cookies.

Defendant's own YouTube posts provided evidence of contempt: Wye Valley NHS Trust v Murphy [2024] EWHC 1912 (KB) - Philip Matthews, Temple Garden Chambers

20/08/24. This case, an application for committal for contempt of court, is noteworthy for the extent of evidence which came from the Defendant himself in the form of social media (YouTube) posts.

Facts

Mr Murphy was the claimant in the underlying clinical negligence action against the Trust. He alleged breach of duty in surgical repair of a left bicep tendon rupture in 2017. He claimed that he had suffered permanent damage to his left arm, which rendered him unable to return to work as a builder and incapable of playing rugby and lifting weights. He claimed past loss of earnings of £109,000 and future losses of £356,562.

The Trust argued fundamental dishonesty and sought dismissal of the claim. Mr Murphy Defendant did not attend the hearing. The trial judge ordered the repayment of an interim payment and awarded the Trust its costs on an indemnity basis.

Subsequently, the Trust brought contempt proceedings against Mr murphy.

Judgment

Mould J found the contempt allegations to have been proved to the criminal standard.

In his assessment of the evidence, particular attention was paid to the Defendant’s social media activity (not least the fact that he had posted a video of himself lifting...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/Ihor Bulyhin

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.