This site uses cookies.

PIBULJ

31 May 2011 - Industry News

Clarke announces reforms, attacks ‘no win, no fee’…
Daily Mail

…causing poll to find that PI solicitors will cut their use of CFAs…
Insurance Medical Group

Supreme Court holds that expert witnesses do not have immunity from suit…
Independent

Insurers overturn Court of Appeal deafness ruling…
Post Online

Supreme Court ruling could lead to increase in asbestos claims…
Personnel Today

Keoghs releases Motor Fraud Index 2011
Keoghs

Six fraudsters jailed for fronting bogus claims company…
Law Society Gazette

Banks lose PPI judicial review challenge…
BBC

31 May 2008 Summary

NEWSLETTER

Industry News
Summary of Recent Cases - Substantive Law
Summary of Recent Cases - Costs
Summary of Recent Cases - Civil Procedure
PI Practitioner

LAW JOURNAL

Editorial

Personal Injury Articles

Care and Case Management Claims, Public Provision, Indemnities and Double Recovery: Squaring the Circle - Elizabeth-Anne Gumbel QC, 1 Crown Office Row & Henry Witcomb, 1 Crown Office Row
The recent litigation in respect of catastrophic injury care claims and public provision of care begins with Avon v Hooper [1997] 1WLR 1605. In that case the local authority sought...

Case Management in Low Velocity Impact Cases - Anthony Johnson, 1 Temple Gardens
The High Court in Mahmood v. Shaw (unreported, HC, 29.02.08) dealt with an issue of case management that frequently arises in so-called “low velocity impact” (LVI) cases. The decision provides much needed clarity as to the circumstances in which a defendant should be granted permission for the claimant to be examined by its own medical expert. The outcome of the appeal is considerably more favourable to defendants than claimants.

To err is human to forgive divine: Spotlight on complaints in the NHS, the crusade for perceived justice. - Odette Hutchinson, Aston University
The Healthcare Commission’s recently published report ‘Spotlight on Complaints’ highlights a general state of malaise with the NHS’ approach to complaint management. The conclusion of this the second report by the Commission is clear, NHS Trusts still have much to do to improve the principle antecedents, which collectively construct complainants’ attainment of perceived justice.

OB (by his mother and litigation friend) (FC) ( Respondent) v Aventis Pasteur SA (Appellants) (2008) UKHL 34 - Debbie Stringer, Open University
A discussion of the recent House of Lords decision concerning substitution of a defendant.


Medico-Legal Articles, Edited by Dr Hugh Koch

Physical Illness and Psychiatric Morbidity: Recent UK study (Cooke etal, 2007) - Dr Hugh Koch
The prevalence of psychological disorders among those who are physically ill is an important and complex issue, typically with physical illness leading to psychological morbidity, directly or indirectly...


Mediation & ADR Articles, Edited by Justin Patten, Human Law

Mediation – A Costs Trap for the Unwary - Tim Wallis, Trust Mediation Ltd
This article outlines a costs trap, reviews recent case law and emphasises the need to give careful consideration to all of the costs of the mediation and the terms of the Mediation Agreement before the day of the mediation.


Charon QC

Charon QC, May 2008
Clairvoyant emptor…

31 May 2011 - PI Practitioner

Interest

Davies v Inman [1999] PIQR Q26

That Court of Appeal set out that, save in a case where there are special reasons not to, there is a ‘presumption that interest is to be awarded on compensation arising from personal injuries’.

Headford v Bristol and District Health Authority [1995] PIQR] P180

The court that determines whether there are such special reasons is the court that awards interest – that is to say it is not for another court to tie the trial judge’s hands.

Hobin v Douglas (No 1) [[1998] CLY 1431

Though it is normally considered that the ‘half rate over the whole period’ approach set out in Jefford v Gee is the best way to calculate interest on Special Damages, Roch LJ set out in this case that a judge is free to depart from that method if another method of calculation would produce a fairer and more accurate result.

29 August 2008 - Industry News

Government announces reforms to road traffic and fast-track claims...
Ministry of Justice

Compensation to severely injured soldiers doubled...
BBC

”Bouncy castle case” ruling overturned by Court of Appeal...
Telegraph

Pleural plaques consultation launched by government...
Ministry of Justice

AXA launches “son of TAG” litigation...
Claims Standards Council

OFT say personal current account market not working well for customers...
Office of Fair Trading

30 November 2009 Summary

NEWSLETTER

Industry News
Summary of Recent Cases - Substantive Law
Summary of Recent Cases - Costs
Summary of Recent Cases - Civil Procedure
PI Practitioner

LAW JOURNAL

Editorial

Personal Injury Articles

Agency Arguments in Credit Hire: Recent Northern Irish Case - Aidan Ellis, 1 Temple Gardens
Agency arguments in credit hire cases remain largely unexplored. This article suggests that both Claimants and Defendants may now have to be prepared to grapple with them directly, as a result of the recent appeal decision in Salt v Helley 2009 NIQB 69. In that case a claim for credit hire charges was dismissed in its entirety because the credit hire company was found to have a conflict of interest, which breached its agency relationship with the Claimant.

An Update on Experts and Assessors - Amy Berry, Pump Court Chambers
The 1st of October 2009 has been and gone but how many of us know that Part 35, practice direction 35 and the protocol for the instruction of experts to give evidence in civil claims have been changed by the 50th update to the CPR as set out in The Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2009 [SI 2092/2009]?

The applicable law in direct claims against insurers: the decision of the Court of Appeal in Maher v Groupama Grand Est [2009] EWCA Civ 1191 - Sarah Prager, 1 Chancery Lane
Regular readers may recall that on 23rd January 2009 Mr Justice Blair gave judgment in Maher v Groupama Grand Est [2009] EWHC 38 (QB), the first of a number of cases proceeding in the High Court in which the central issue related to the applicable law in direct claims against road traffic insurers. Blair J decided two issues: the law governing (1) the assessment of damages, and (2) pre-judgment interest on those damages. The decision was appealed, and on 12th November 2009 Lords Justice Mummery, Moore-Bick and Etherton handed down judgment in the case.


Medico-Legal Articles, Edited by Dr Hugh Koch

Safety ‘Net’ for emotional problems - Dr Hugh Koch
A study of approximately 300 patients with depression from Bristol, London and Warwick were either given online cognitive behaviour therapy or customary GP support sessions. Positive outcomes were found...

Relieving Stress in Bristol: Drinking versus Stress Management - Dr Hugh Koch
A recent survey indicated that 50% of Bristolians say they drink alcohol after work to relieve stress and cited work stress as a key cause of their drinking. Drinking, according to the Government’s ‘Know your Limits’ campaign also arises from social pressure to drink with work colleagues.

Travel Anxiety: From Charles Dickens to the current day - Dr Manda Holmshaw, Moving Minds
Evidence based research outcomes show psychological treatments such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) or Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing (EMDR) to be highly successful in treating travel anxiety and phobias.


Coronial Law Articles, Edited by Bridget Dolan, 3 Serjeants’ Inn

Should a Licence be Granted for the Exhumation of a Body in the Face of a Family’s Objection? - Susanna Rickard, Pupil Barrister, 3 Serjeants’ Inn
R (HM Coroner for the Eastern District of London) V. Secretary of State for Justice and Interested Parties (1) Susan Sutovic (2) Velisa Sutovic and (3) Marko Sutovic. [2009] EWHC 1974 (Admin)


Mediation & ADR Articles, Edited by Tim Wallis, Trust Mediation Ltd

Does Mediation have a place in personal injury claims where fraud is alleged? - Martin Cockx, Amelans Solicitors
Fraud, let’s call it the F word, is on the increase so we are told and certain well known Defendant firms have whole departments dedicated to the detection, eradication and prosecution of fraudsters...


Marketing for Solicitors

Marketing Your Practice Part 11: Seasonal Celebrations, Opportunity or Threat- Jenny Cotton, Mortons Marketing
We have all read spoof risk assessments and many may well recall one for the office Christmas tree. The office party at any season raises other questions and potentially greater opportunities and threats...


Charon QC

Charon QC, November 2009
Nemo iudex in causa sua: Do me a por favor!

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.