This site uses cookies.

April 2020 Contents

 

Welcome to the April 2020 issue of PI Brief Update Law Journal. Click the relevant links below to read the articles.

CPD

Note that there are no new monthly CPD quizzes since the SRA and the BSB have both updated their CPD schemes to eliminate this requirement. Reading PIBULJ articles can still help to meet your CPD needs. For further details see our CPD Information page.

 

Personal Injury Articles
FREE CHAPTER from 'A Practical Guide to the Pre-Action RTA Claims Protocol for Personal Injury Lawyers' by Antonia Ford
The aim of this book is to provide a practical guide to all stages of the RTA Protocol to assist in the handling of pre-litigation claims and inform Practitioners of the potential impact that pre-litigation decisions may have on future litigation....
Credit Hire and Fundamental Dishonesty - Aidan Ellis, Temple Garden Chambers
For many years, the claimants in credit hire cases were habitually described by Judges as honest witnesses, perhaps confused about the detail of the contractual arrangements but always trying their best to assist the court. However, the growing judicial awareness of the problem of fraudulent claims in soft tissue injury cases and the increasing reliance on section 57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 means that...
Andrea Brown v Comissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Others [2019] EWCA Civ 1724: The Court of Appeal addressed the application of QOCS in 'mixed' claims - Ian Meikle, Civitas Law
AB had brought actions relating to allegedly wrongful use of personal data, claiming damages for personal injury, for breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 (“DPA”) and the Human Rights Act 1998 ('HRA') and for breach of contract, misfeasance in public office and the misuse of private information. Her claim was therefore 'mixed' (i.e. included claims for personal and injury and otherwise) for the purposes of CPR 44.13-44.16...
Do not stand on ceremony, else time will become the Claimant’s enemy: Durkan -v- Schmidt - James Devenny, Horwich Farrelly
This case relates to an accident that occurred in 2011; the Claimant conducted the claim through the portal process, which at that point had an upper limit of £10,000. Very little progress was made and eventually, proceedings were issued under the Part 8B procedure, and the Claimant applied for a stay of proceedings...
Case Summary: D v S - Karen Cawood, Spencers Solicitors Limited
On the 11th April 2015 the Claimant was driving his motor vehicle along the road between Filey and York. As he proceeded correctly along the road, a motor vehicle being driven by the Defendant and approaching from the opposite direction, crossed over into the Claimant’s path and collided with the Claimant’s vehicle causing it to spin and roll onto its roof. The Defendant was trying to change his radio and this is why he was on the wrong side of the road...
Summary of Recent Cases, April 2020
Here is a summary of the recent notable court cases over the past month...
PI Practitioner, April 2020
Each issue a particular topic is highlighted, citing some of the useful cases and other materials in that area. This month we provide resources and updates in relation to courts and hearings during Covid-19...
Medico-Legal Articles, Edited by Dr Hugh Koch
Experts' Joint Statements: Key Medico-Legal Issues - Koch, HCH, Davies M & Laraway A
Background: Christopher Sharp QC (St. John’s Chambers, Bristol) reviewed a series of recent cases which involved the preparation of Joint Statements. This excellent review raised a number of issues which are discussed here (Sharp C (2019) Part 35 and the Expert’s Joint Statement)...
Clinical Negligence Medicine by Dr Mark Burgin
Intolerable Regulation or Necessary Progress: has MedCo lost its way? - Dr Mark Burgin
Dr Mark Burgin considers why MedCo’s brand has become tarnished and how reducing costs, improving representation and recruitment could repair the damage...
Evidence of Large-Scale Neglect for Child Mental Health - Dr Mark Burgin
Dr Mark Burgin BM BCh (oxon) MRCGP considers the legal implications of a recent study by Stem4 reported in GP online based on a poll of 1000 GPs...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.