This site uses cookies.

Summary of Recent Cases, November 2018

15/11/18. Here is a summary of the recent notable court cases over the past month. You can also receive these for free by registering for our PI Brief Update newsletter. Just select "Free Newsletter" from the menu at the top of this page and fill in your email address.

Summary of Recent Cases - Substantive Law

Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50

In this month's edition, we consider in detail the case of Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, in which the Supreme Court unanimously held that a hospital receptionist owed a duty of care not to give misleading or inaccurate information about waiting times to a person who presented at the hospital's A&E department. The case raises a host of issues concerning the duty of care - including the scope of the duty owed by A&E departments to members of the public before any professional assessment of that person's medical needs has been undertaken, the circumstances in which recourse should be had to the Caparo test in deciding whether to impose a novel duty of care, and the relevance of the financial and other pressures that A&E departments face in identifying the existence and scope of any duty of care.

Mr Darnley presented at the...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/spxChrome

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.