This site uses cookies.

PI Practitioner, July 2018

16/07/18. Each issue a particular topic is highlighted, citing some of the useful cases and other materials in that area. You can also receive these for free by registering for our PI Brief Update newsletter. Just select "Free Newsletter" from the menu at the top of this page and fill in your email address.

Molodi v Cambridge [2018] EWHC 1288 (QB) and Richards & Anor v Morris [2018] EWHC 1289 (QB) - Case Comment

Regular readers of the Personal Injury Brief Update blog will note that Molodi was summarised in the June edition. However, these two cases (both handed down by Mr Justice Martin Spencer on the same date in May) deserve a little more detailed consideration. In both, the Defendant appealed from decisions of the County Court in respect of minor personal injury claims which had been successful at first instance. Litigators in this area will be aware of the common class of claims termed 'low velocity' or 'low speed' impact cases. These cases occupy a large amount of County Court time, but very rarely make it to higher courts, and there are therefore few reported decisions on common issues that practitioners face on a daily basis.

The facts of each can be stated shortly. In both, the Claimants brought claims for...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/EmiliaU

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.